-
周波:马克龙声称北约已经“脑死亡”,但它现在看起来更像 “活僵尸”
最后更新: 2022-07-31 17:10:33本文英文全文:
When the audience at a concert hear a singer hitting the highest note, they know the song is probably coming to an end. And Nato’s future will be much the same: when Sweden and Finland join – a sure thing in the near future, the 32-member transatlantic alliance might have reached the end of its expansion.
Of the other three candidates on the waiting list for Nato membership, Georgia and Ukraine’s requests appear doomed by Russia’s warring response. It remains to be seen if Moscow would react as it has warned if Bosnia and Herzegovina takes steps towards joining Nato, but the alliance might also think twice after seeing what has occurred in Ukraine.
The cold war in Europe has never really ended with the fall of the Soviet Union. The battlefield in Ukraine is but a stage of continued rivalry for sphere of influence between Nato and Russia.
Does Russia have a legitimate sphere of influence? If Moscow believes there is one, and would fight for it, then it does. This is easy to understand if one thinks of how the United States reacted when the Soviet Union placed missiles at its doorstep in 1962. The Cuban missile crisis brought the world close to the brink of an all-out nuclear war.
Military alliances survive on “threats”. If they fail to find one, they will create one. But for a juggernaut such as Nato to survive, it needs to constantly expand.
Examples of Nato seeking out threats can be seen in the 78-day bombing of Belgrade in 1999 during the war in Kosovo. It can also be seen in the 2011 operation by a Nato-led coalition against Libya and its ruler Muammar Gaddafi. The operation led to Gaddafi’s ousting and the country was plunged into the depths of civil war.
But no threat is bigger and more useful than a “Russia threat”. Yes, Russia is not the Soviet Union, but who looks most like the Soviet Union? Only Russia. Both Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin expressed interests in Nato membership for Russia, but unsurprisingly they were rejected. Russia’s membership in Nato would render the alliance meaningless and dissolve it from the inside.
The war in Ukraine has strengthened the solidarity of Nato, but only for a while. Instead, it might well become a turning point in the eventual disintegration of the alliance. Out of fear of Russia, more European countries in Nato will most certainly increase their defence spending. This will add to Europe’s strategic autonomy from Washington.
A typical example is Germany. Before the war in Ukraine, the richest country in Europe has consistently spent less than 2 per cent of its GDP on defence, which is an obligation for Nato members. But in February, Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced that Germany would spend more than 2 per cent of GDP on defence every year. Like a magician who suddenly pulls a rabbit out of their hat, he announced a €100 billion (US$102.1 billion) fund for the armed forces.
Europe's strategic autonomy would allow the US to leave Europe to the Europeans so it can focus on China, which it perceives to be a greater long-term threat than Russia. For Washington, an ideal situation is one where Nato stays focused mainly on collective defence in Europe while at the same time European allies support the US in containing China in the Indo-Pacific.
This is a daydream. So far, Britain, France and Germany have not done much beyond a few symbolic sailings through the South China Sea in the name of freedom of navigation. Although China was identified as a “systemic challenge” for the first time at the Nato summit in June, Nato has yet to explicitly describe China as a “threat”.
For European allies of the US, too much focus on China risks diverting the alliance from the real threat: Russia. China and Nato are too far away from each other. It's inconceivable that China would one day send troops to fight against a European country. Likewise, it's hard to imagine that Nato would get directly involved in a potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
Even though Nato invited leaders from non-allied partners Japan, Korea, Australia and New Zealand to attend this year’s summit for the first time, an “Asian Nato” is unlikely to take shape. In the Indo-Pacific, even the closest ally of the US might not wish to be seen as a member of the anti-China club.
An Asian Nato has already been tried once in the form of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization. Founded in 1954 and described by Sir James Cable as "a fig leaf for the nakedness of American policy", it was primarily created to block further communist gains in Southeast Asia, but it was only in existence for about two decades. Today, ASEAN is China’s largest trading partner.
Only if China and Russia become allies can Nato thrive in a new cold war. But there is no evidence of a Sino-Russian alliance if one watches through the prism of the conflict in Ukraine. Beijing has managed, however painstakingly, to strike a balance between its strategic partner Russia and Ukraine, which has China as one of its largest trading partners.
China’s carefully calibrated neutrality might not be what Europe wants, but it should be acceptable to Europeans who are nervous about a potential Sino-Russian alliance. The fact that China hasn’t provided military assistance to Russia should be a relief.
If small nations get together for self-defence, it is understandable. But if the largest alliance on earth wishes to expand, it is not about defence but enforcing its own values on others with a big stick. No alliance will last forever. As long as the West continues to decline though, Nato will be on the wane. French President Emmanuel Macron called Nato “brain dead”, but perhaps it looks more like a zombie that is still walking.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 戴苏越 
-
冯德莱恩首次谴责欧尔班“种族混合”发言:践踏欧盟价值观
2022-07-31 17:10 欧洲乱局 -
“不打领带,保持凉爽”
2022-07-31 16:39 极端天气 -
女婿爆料:特朗普靠卖招牌红色棒球帽日入8万美元
2022-07-31 14:40 -
全美猴痘病例一周翻倍至5189例:缺疫苗、联邦地方互批再上演
2022-07-31 14:36 美国一梦 -
佩洛西行程公布,未提台湾
2022-07-31 14:27 中美关系 -
又一欧洲国家被俄“断气”
2022-07-31 11:14 欧洲乱局 -
在纽约,不到2美元的罐头都被装进防盗盒里了…
2022-07-31 11:13 -
“佩洛西此行,危险的军事政治冒险主义行为”
2022-07-31 10:56 -
亚洲行途中佩洛西连发4条推特,没提台湾
2022-07-31 09:55 中美关系 -
白宫:拜登检测再次阳性,重新隔离
2022-07-31 07:55 美国一梦 -
美国新增感染61609例、死亡69例
2022-07-31 07:45 美国一梦 -
台海局势紧张之际,共和党议员提出对台武器租借法案
2022-07-30 22:17 中美关系 -
王毅访问吉尔吉斯斯坦,吉外长:盼加快推进中吉乌铁路
2022-07-30 22:10 中国外交 -
胡锡进发文“若拦阻无效可击落佩洛西座机”,推特要求删除
2022-07-30 21:05 中美关系 -
“中国正就俄乌问题帮美国,佩洛西待家里别去惹他们”
2022-07-30 19:26 中美关系 -
习近平就菲律宾遭受地震灾害向总统马科斯致慰问电
2022-07-30 18:52 -
“马克龙被非洲官员当面羞辱了?”
2022-07-30 17:40 -
特朗普批评:最不应该!
2022-07-30 17:20 美国政治 -
一掌拍飞好莱坞第二高身价,他时隔4个月再道歉…
2022-07-30 16:46 -
“我们要接受能源价格上涨…”“滚!”
2022-07-30 16:30 乌克兰之殇
相关推荐 -
他在以色列监狱中死亡,联合国官员:极度震惊 评论 210俄方通缉泽连斯基等乌军政要员,乌方回应 评论 200“哈马斯得到美方保证”?以官员威胁:不会同意 评论 106国际刑事法院忍无可忍:再威胁试试 评论 234省级督察组现场核实情况,遭故意封路阻挠 评论 136最新闻 Hot
-
国际刑事法院忍无可忍:再威胁试试
-
澳大利亚“设卡”,中国在非洲淘到“白金”
-
“半数以上AI最热门领域,中国研究领先”
-
省级督察组现场核实情况,遭故意封路阻挠
-
美国又出新规:想要补贴,电动汽车上不能有“中国制造”
-
“中俄在台海附近军演,逼着美国改计划”
-
他催拜登采取行动:保住内塔尼亚胡,不然逮捕令会落到咱们身上
-
以代表称:没料到美国精英大学里也有哈马斯
-
“内塔尼亚胡决心竞选连任”
-
香港暴徒“屠龙小队”队长:计划使用炸弹杀害港警,至少30个
-
“美国各地逾2000名抗议者被捕”
-
“欧盟得把成年男性遣返乌克兰,上战场”
-
“这样拆掉中国设备,许多农村就没网了”
-
果然,印度和日本破防了
-
“美军还没撤,俄军就把这里占了”
-
“北约发这种提案,简直疯了”
-