-
周波:“极限竞争”距冲突仅一步之遥
ZHOU Bo: As the US focuses on ‘extreme competition’ with China, conflict is just a step away
The dust from the Afghan war has yet to settle but the fallout is clear. With the ending of the US global crusade on terrorism, the prelude to President Joe Biden’s “extreme competition” with China has begun. The question is: how long will it last?
If the 20-year war in Afghanistan is a “forever war” for the United States, then its competition with China could be described as “forever competition”, because it will surely last longer. Gone are the days when China could “hide its strength and bide its time”.
The second-largest economy in the world is simply too big to hide. And it is impossible for Beijing to bide its time when Washington takes it as its primary strategic competitor.
But in the economic field, the die is cast. At the end of last year, China’s economy was 70 per cent of America’s. It is widely assumed that, by around 2030, China will overtake the US to become the world’s largest economy in terms of gross domestic product.
According to Yale professor Paul Kennedy, this will be a situation that has not existed since the 1880s, when America’s economy overtook Britain’s. For the entire 20th century, the American economy was about two to four times larger than that of any other great power.
When China emerges as the world’s largest economy, as former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd pointed out, it will be the first time since George III (1738-1820) that the world will have a non-English-speaking, non-democratic, non-Western state as its largest economy.
This will be a seismic change for Americans, who have been fed the myth since they were born that America is “exceptional” or “indispensable”. They will have to come to terms with common sense: nations rise and fall; Americans are like everyone else.
When the economy of an “authoritarian state” such as China surpasses that of the US, the influence of Western democracy will be looking at its nadir. According to Freedom House, democracy around the globe has been declining since 2006. Polls show that most Americans are dissatisfied with the state of the US.
Winston Churchill famously said that “democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried”. If this suggests that, in spite of its problems, democracy is still better than other forms of government, then the Capitol insurrection on January 6 showed how democracy can be virulent or even deadly violent.
It is hard to believe the Capitol building – the supreme seat of American democracy – would be violently attacked by a mob of supporters at the call of former president Donald Trump and false allegations of election fraud.
Until 2030, China-US competition will most certainly intensify in that the US will take it as the last chance to bring down a rising power. The recent “Aukus” agreement between the US, Britain and Australia allows the US to share its jealously guarded nuclear-powered submarine technology with Australia, which meant scrapping Australia’s multibillion-dollar submarine deal with France.
Such an unusual move, described by French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian as a “stab in the back”, shows how the US could resort to desperate measures against a competitor at the cost of an important ally.
But while a few nuclear subs might indeed complicate decision-making in Beijing, they are not necessarily game-changers. For Australia, balancing is probably an art too delicate to learn. Historically, most of the wars that Australian soldiers fought are other people’s wars which they joined as junior partners.
This time, the Morrison government has obviously decided to risk taking America’s side in a military conflict with China. Given Australia’s inevitable reliance on US and British nuclear technologies in the decades to come, the Morrison government has left succeeding Australian governments hostage to its decision.
Even with some British and Australian help, time is not on America’s side. The Pentagon’s war games over Taiwan showed the US losing repeatedly to China. Of course, this is no reason for China to be complacent, but should a conflict occur in China’s periphery, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has all the advantages of being on home turf.
Today, America’s armed forces are considerably smaller and older than they were in the 1980s. The PLA is just the opposite. By 2019, the PLA Navy had about 350 ships, outnumbering the US Navy’s around 293 ships. Although quantity is not quality, it has a quality all its own.
Nothing speaks of a country’s security assessment more than its defence expenditure. For three decades, China’s military expenditure has stayed below 2 per cent of GDP. It speaks volumes about China’s self-confidence about its security challenges.
If China feels threatened to the extent that it has to increase its defence spending, the second-largest economy could easily afford to double the defence budget; but can the US double its military spending, which is already three times larger than China’s?
Biden said that US rivalry with China will take the form of “extreme competition” rather than conflict. But when competition becomes extreme, it is one step away from conflict. Contrary to the US, which emphasises competition, China has righteously called for cooperation. But it takes two to tango. A country cannot compete without strength; likewise, it can only cooperate with strength.
The pendulum of US foreign and defence policy traditionally swings between assertiveness and pullbacks. The question is when will an America in retrenchment swing back, or will it swing back at all? The US pull-out from Afghanistan was justified as a means for America to focus on competition with China. Only time will tell if this is a wise decision.
But if it is a boneheaded strategic blunder, then it is a monumental error more consequential than the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars combined. It will doom America’s hegemonic status, held since the late 19th century, for good.
Zhou Bo is a senior fellow at the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University and a China Forum expert
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 小婷 
-
美方称普京挑美女翻译分散特朗普注意力,俄方回应
2021-09-29 08:12 特朗普 -
朝鲜首次试射高超音速武器
2021-09-29 07:43 朝鲜现状 -
美国新增确诊109691例、死亡1937例
2021-09-29 07:29 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
美中央司令部司令:我负全责
2021-09-29 07:06 阿富汗 -
谷歌删除RT在YouTube的2个频道,俄方:将处以罚款
2021-09-29 07:05 俄罗斯之声 -
“我没孟晚舟幸运,我的祖国没有给我强大支持”
2021-09-28 21:56 华为 -
“立陶宛在对华外交上没有长远计划”
2021-09-28 21:53 欧洲乱局 -
阿媒:塔利班将暂时执行查希尔·沙赫国王时期宪法
2021-09-28 21:22 阿富汗 -
捷克排除中俄参与核电站项目,外交部回应
2021-09-28 20:51 核电 -
孟晚舟回国后,中方代表在联大舌战加拿大外交官
2021-09-28 19:35 欢乐联合国 -
俄媒:在反华同盟里印度是多余的
2021-09-28 19:05 -
离美国政府关门还剩不到三天,共和党“违约”了
2021-09-28 18:17 美国政治 -
韩法院命令三菱重工出售资产赔偿二战劳工,日本急了
2021-09-28 18:00 日本 -
莫里森称中方无兴趣与澳直接对话,外交部回应
2021-09-28 17:26 -
外交部:孟晚舟事件得以妥善解决具有积极意义
2021-09-28 17:19 观察者头条 -
潜艇生意被英美“撬走”,法国转头卖了3艘护卫舰给希腊
2021-09-28 17:12 法国见闻 -
美媒妄称在华西方人或被用作人质,外交部:又在玩“狼来了”
2021-09-28 16:19 -
1977年纽约大停电引发了9个月后的婴儿潮?研究:停电对出生率无影响
2021-09-28 15:00 -
抗衡“一带一路”,拜登先从拉美下手了
2021-09-28 14:14 美国一梦
相关推荐 -
“中国有望实现沙伊复交后又一突破” 评论 61“5G、AI和棉花产业变革,帮新疆战胜美国制裁” 评论 70继续升级!威胁停学、惊现“狙击手”、学生占领行政楼 评论 295“中国制造2025已实现86%,证明美国制裁无效” 评论 373“不管枪支教育,却禁掉我谋生工具,这就是我的国家” 评论 195最新闻 Hot
-
CNN最新民调,拜登尴尬了…
-
特朗普与德桑蒂斯“破冰”会面,讨论筹集竞选资金
-
美国宣布以军5支部队“侵犯人权”,但不提制裁
-
美国记者问西方走到尽头是什么?杜金的回答很有意思
-
外媒紧盯福建舰:或马上开始海试
-
继续升级!威胁停学、惊现“狙击手”、学生占领行政楼
-
“23条立法不额外限制媒体批评政府自由,无论有多尖锐”
-
美国终于给他“撑腰”
-
“中国制造2025已实现86%,证明美国制裁无效”
-
印度人“后槽牙都咬碎了”
-
他施压内塔尼亚胡:不进攻拉法,政府就会被推翻
-
他“催”哈马斯尽快接受停火协议:以色列异常慷慨
-
禁了TikTok,谁会得利?看看印度......
-
在这一领域,中国占6成,远超欧洲的19%和美国的9%
-
美报告挑事:欧盟任何惩罚都过于温和,无法阻止中国电动车,除非...
-
所罗门群岛总理索加瓦雷退出新任期竞选
-