-
朱萧发:英国为什么脱欧,中国人读读《论语》就能明白
关键字: 中国历史欧洲历史欧盟英国历史英国脱欧中英关系To explore this idea, let’s compare the two cultures from a legal standpoint. In this regard, the EU is again an experiment in hyper-rationalism: the unyielding ‘four freedoms’ of capital, people, goods, and services are not based on a relativistic assessment of the different needs and cultures of each state, but an abstract, philosophical principle. In addition, the great constitutional documents of France and the US, both of which arose from the Enlightenment tradition, declare abstract principles rather than traditional practices. On the other hand, Lord Chancellors (responsible for the effecting running of the British courts) of the past have pointed out that the law in the UK is utterly, brilliantly, illogical. The miscellaneous body of Common Law, which makes up the British Constitution, is composed of rulings of which none are ‘higher’ or universal. Each case decides only what it decides: precedent is not principle.
In this regard, British and Chinese political culture are like long-lost brothers. Confucius stayed well away from three afflictions, which from the Jacobins to the Soviets have been the source of some of the greatest human tragedies. Firstly, he decried ‘theory-making’, thinking men who were enslaved to harsh and self-imposed principles to be no more imaginative than ‘stones’. One of the most memorable incidents of The Analects is when Confucius reprimands a disciple for trying to determine a formula for the cause and effect of human behaviour. A quick glance at Marx’s Grundrisse can show us how the Enlightenment is nothing if not the reduction of history’s complexities to a simple formula. Secondly, Confucius taught that no rule should be ‘immutable’: ‘a good man is not slavish to a path others have trodden’. This fits with the famously supple nature of the British constitution, which Tocqueville credited for the lack of a French Revolution event in Britain. Thirdly, Confucius claimed that nothing should be ‘beyond doubt’. These three positions remind us of what Chinese and British political culture share in the face of hostile universalism.
The United Kingdom and the People’s Republic of China both have a history of ideas that is strikingly similar in their shared aversion to the dogmatic fixation on abstract principles embodied in the European project. For refusing to embrace EU federalism, the UK is smeared for ‘living in the past’. This cannot be denied. Unusually, the referendum gave the opportunity to vote not to join a political project, but leave one. As a result, the constitutional clock was turned back to 1973. Indeed, most of the buzzphrases used by Brexiteers - ‘we want our country back’, ‘loss of sovereignty’, ‘take back control’ - all alluded to this. But what is wrong with the past? It is where our identities - personal, national, or otherwise - are based. And it is our biases, prejudices, and hopes which make up our identity - not some unsympathetic, faceless dictator called Reason. When the breakdown of the EU finally, inevitably comes, you can be sure they will blame anyone, anything - the parochial British, the backward Southern states, even suffering refugees - than notice that their ideology is flawed, and Reason holds them prisoner.
Given China’s similar relationship with history, the PRC should take notice of the UK”s treatment. However, any defence of Britain would currently be inadvisable. Indeed, China is keeping its head down in the best tradition of Deng Xiaoping. Us Brits cannot blame them for this - the EU is a larger market. However, there will come a point when China’s super-heavyweight standing in the world compels it to put short-term pragmatism aside and assert its values in a long-term strategy against those, like the EU, who look to destroy the varied traditions and cultures of the world in favour of a single, global civilisation.
When asked whether he could imagine an outcome in which the UK stays a part of the EU (even after having voted to do the opposite), Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, channelled John Lennon. With that quirky wit for which career bureaucrats are famous, Tusk said that the EU was “built on dreams that seemed impossible to achieve, so who knows? You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one”.
With an understanding of the political philosophy underpinning the EU, Tusk’s comments strike us less as an ill-conceived tease, and more like a Freudian slip revealing how he appears to share the sinister agenda (“imagine there’s [sic] no countries… and no religion too”) of the third most talented Beatle. Like Lennon, Tusk wants the world to “live as one” - under one unforgiving morality in what the EU calls ‘ever-closer union’. This undermines cultural integrity and ignores history. Europe should confront and scrutinise its history - but under no circumstances forget it. Thus far, the EU has shown itself to be the centrist heir to the brutal regimes of the last 250 years that aimed to do just that. But perhaps the saddest part of this story is that in addition to that which which the European Union has already taken from the United Kingdom - jobs, freedom, sovereignty, and democracy - we must now add The Beatles.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 请支持独立网站,转发请注明本文链接:
- 责任编辑:杨晗轶
- 最后更新: 2018-06-12 10:38:59
-
古巴回应美外交官遭“声波攻击”:未查出怪病原因
2018-06-12 09:50 拉美左翼 -
刚说要请俄回G7,马上又追加制裁
2018-06-12 07:33 美国政治 -
G7应该向中国取经?耿爽这样回应
2018-06-11 20:06 上合组织 -
一组利比亚对比图
2018-06-11 19:18 -
搭国航是朝方要求还是中国意见?外交部回应
2018-06-11 18:34 朝鲜现状 -
他信高调晒美国游合照:重回故地,莫名开心
2018-06-11 17:02 泰国政局 -
西班牙这地区为了搞独立,组了条202公里的“人链”
2018-06-11 16:28 欧洲乱局 -
“不欢迎中国人” 澳墨尔本现歧视性租房海报标语
2018-06-11 16:03 海外华人 -
特朗普再就贸易“羞辱”加拿大 加媒这样反击
2018-06-11 15:59 美国经济 -
中外专家对话:俄罗斯与西方,何去何从?
2018-06-11 14:30 观察者头条 -
普京:上合组织比G7更有优势
2018-06-11 13:50 上合组织 -
特朗普两顾问炮轰加总理:背后捅刀子,小心下地狱
2018-06-11 11:05 美国经济 -
特金会前 新加坡遣返韩记者:擅入朝使住处
2018-06-11 10:00 新加坡 -
越南多地发生非法聚集 我使馆提醒注意出行安全
2018-06-11 09:37 中国游客 -
为办特金会,新加坡花了多少钱?
2018-06-11 08:33 三八线之南 -
伊拉克大选刚要重新计票 最大票仓就发生大火
2018-06-11 07:41 伊拉克局势 -
新加坡挂中国国旗酒店澄清:为应景
2018-06-10 22:48 新加坡 -
“特金会”在即 背后博弈考量几何
2018-06-10 20:38 朝鲜现状 -
美媒:“特金会”谈点啥?建交开馆都有可能
2018-06-10 20:23 朝鲜现状
相关推荐 -
“6年增加两倍”,美军高官又炒:中国速度“惊人” 评论 34NASA局长抹黑中国登月,连专业常识都不顾了 评论 379“中国报价太香,加税50%都吓不跑美国买家” 评论 281挺巴抗议席卷全美高校,大批学生遭逮捕 评论 456习近平主持召开新时代推动西部大开发座谈会 评论 74最新闻 Hot
-
“6年增加两倍”,美军高官又炒:中国速度“惊人”
-
“这泼天的富贵暂时轮不上美国”
-
“价格战太激烈,大众在华目标就是保住份额”
-
朔尔茨称“普京没资格”,俄方反怼
-
“以色列是种族隔离国家!”纽约爆发抗议,数百犹太人被捕
-
“宁德时代被美国施压还赚了,韩企投资美国怎么反而要亏?”
-
俄国防部副部长涉严重贪腐被拘
-
NASA局长抹黑中国登月,连专业常识都不顾了
-
特朗普迎接:我喜欢这人
-
欧洲急着减排,却发现实现目标得依赖中国
-
“中国报价太香,加税50%都吓不跑美国买家”
-
美太平洋舰队司令来华参会:2019年后来华最高级别军官
-
中国进口贴标“美国制造”,这家高端美企要被罚惨了
-
挺巴抗议席卷全美高校,大批学生遭逮捕
-
这是他访华的“筹码”?美官员忙否认
-
伊朗总统警告以色列:若再来犯,让你“寸草不生”
-