-
周波:美国将军们绞尽脑汁,猜测中国是否会使用武力?
以下为采访原文:
Interviewer: Thank you so much, Zhou Bo, for joining me today. For those who may not know you, you are currently a senior fellow at the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University. Previously, you served as a Senior Colonel in the People’s Liberation Army. We have a lot of questions to get to, especially for Americans and Western audiences, there’s a lot of misunderstanding, especially on the geopolitical and military fronts when it comes to U.S.-China relations and China's role in the world.
Let’s start with the South China Sea and the Philippines. Recently, we’ve seen many stories in the West about China and the Philippines getting into skirmishes, which are being described confrontations. I want to ask you about your understanding of these growing tensions that the US and the West are talking about. What is China's position on the South China Sea? What is actually going on between China and the Philippines?
Zhou Bo: Thank you. Actually, you’ve asked several good questions, and it's not easy to give a short answer, but I’ll try my best.
First, when there’s a rivalry between a giant like China and a smaller country like the Philippines, people instinctively feel more sympathy for the smaller one. This is human nature—similar to how people love baby cucumbers or baby tomatoes, they just look more adorable and eatable. In this case, I understand how people might feel.
But let me provide a simple fact: very few people seem to know that it is actually the Filipinos who have killed Chinese fishermen on three occasions—in 2000, 2006, and 2013, against innocent Chinese fishermen from both Mainland China and Taiwan, which is part of China. If people understood this and also realized that China has never used force against the Philippines, their perception might change.
For example, in 1999, the Filipino government deliberately stranded a rusted World War II-era warship on the Ren Ai Jiao(Second Thomas Shoal). China protested, the Filipino government made promises but claimed so-called “technical difficulties”, and so they didn’t tow it away. Then, this became an issue. But think about this: given the overwhelming military strength of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), if we decided to do something, couldn’t we easily resolve this issue? The simple question is, how could those Filipino marine corp soldiers have remained there for 25 years if the Chinese government and the PLA are not self-restrained.
Yes, Chinese Coast Guard vessels have used water cannons. This might look dramatic on TV, especially when the other party is a smaller country. However, I would argue that this is precisely because we do not want to use force, so this is a kind of deterrence, aimed at preventing the Filipino Coast Guard from delivering building materials to fortify the stranded ship to a permanent base.
Interviewer: That’s a very different perspective than what we often see in Western media. In the West, we often hear about China's "aggressive ambitions" in the South China Sea, and blame for the disputes is frequently placed solely on China because China is the bigger country. What is the truth about this, because these disputes are very misunderstood; I don’t think the ordinary person in the US would know about it. What would you say?
Zhou Bo: Western media often claims that China wants to turn the South China Sea into a “Chinese lake,” but this is not true. According to the Chinese government, we believe all the islands and rocks in the South China Sea are Chinese territory. With these territories, China naturally could claim rights to territorial seas, contiguous zones and exclusive economic zones under international law. However, we do not have a claim over the entire South China Sea. That is China’s position.
Additionally, terms like “aggressive” and “coercive” are frequently used to describe China’s actions, but there is no evidence of China using—or even threatening to use—force in the South China Sea. In fact, China and ASEAN countries are negotiating a “Code of Conduct in the South China Sea”. While this process has been slower than it should be, the question is, who is to be blamed? I would say nobody is to be blamed. People always neglect a fact: disputes exist among ASEAN claimants themselves. I think it’s somewhat unfair that whenever we talk about South China Sea, it immediately becomes an issue between China and other claimants; that’s not true.
Interviewer: You mentioned water cannons used by the Chinese Coast Guard, which you've emphasized in previous interviews as an indication that China seeks to prevent larger conflicts rather than escalate them. However, there have also been incidents where Filipino and Chinese vessels rammed into each other. Could you talk about this? Western media, such as CNN, often portrays these incidents as evidence of China's escalation. What do you know about these incidents?
Zhou Bo: When two ships get close to each other, there’s always a risk of collision. If one ship tries to stop another from moving somewhere, a collision can happen too. I won’t point fingers at which side caused such incidents, because both sides are trying to prevent the other from achieving specific objectives.
However, stepping back, my general assessment is that there won’t be a serious conflict in the South China Sea. This is partly because China’s military strength is overwhelming, allowing us to keep the situation under control. Additionally, we’ve pledged not to use or threaten to use force in the South China Sea, and other claimants have made similar commitments.
Therefore, my best hope is that Mother Nature itself will eventually resolve some of these issues, because Mother Nature has its own strength, called “force majeure”. Consider the ship itself: as it becomes more and more rusted, and China decides not to use force, eventually, the vessel will disintegrate because of Mother Nature, this outcome might serve everyone’s interests.
标签 菲律宾-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 唐晓甫 
-
以色列要求近东救济工程处在1月30日前停止在耶路撒冷运营
2025-01-25 07:27 巴以恩仇录 -
斯洛伐克外长:如果美国停止援乌,斯方拒绝欧盟接手
2025-01-25 07:27 乌克兰之殇 -
欧尔班:乌克兰必须保证
2025-01-25 07:22 乌克兰之殇 -
联合国安理会:谴责一切形式的恐怖主义
2025-01-25 07:08 -
王毅同鲁比奥通话:希望你好自为之
2025-01-24 23:33 中美关系 -
“DeepSeek崛起提醒我们:越制裁,中企进步越快?”
2025-01-24 22:52 人工智能 -
五国都有司法管辖权,这起外轮碰撞纠纷为何在华断案?
2025-01-24 22:13 中国外交 -
“他不是天使,该负责任”
2025-01-24 20:28 乌克兰之殇 -
“偷完井盖偷水龙头…”
2025-01-24 19:54 日本 -
中国公布研发投入,“西方顶尖机构很紧张”
2025-01-24 19:05 观察者头条 -
找不到证据告中国,欧盟想到这招…
2025-01-24 18:18 -
20年来首次!中国品牌“吃下”日本一半市场
2025-01-24 16:10 观察者头条 -
指责完中国,欧盟扭头也要搞补贴
2025-01-24 16:04 欧洲乱局 -
特朗普称希望中国发挥重大作用,外交部回应
2025-01-24 15:41 乌克兰之殇 -
特朗普称“宁愿不对华加征关税”,中方回应
2025-01-24 15:34 中美关系 -
怼完马斯克后,奥特曼晒“星际之门”首期工厂
2025-01-24 15:24 观网财经-海外 -
日外相为鲁比奥说好话:他对中国没那么硬啦
2025-01-24 14:29 日本 -
“TikTok那都不叫事,有那么多东西都是中国造的,咋没人提呢”
2025-01-24 14:12 应对特朗普冲击波 -
“中国几十年前的豪赌,收获了巨大回报”
2025-01-24 12:18 观察者头条 -
特朗普:撤销蓬佩奥安保
2025-01-24 12:04 特朗普
相关推荐 -
摩擦升级?洪森称柬武器可打击曼谷,泰方回怼 评论 73与中国竞争,电先不够了?特朗普拟“开闸放地” 评论 59又卖惨,“没中国,我们只能停工” 评论 147“中方提速:欧洲稳了,但在美国的还得等等” 评论 172白玉兰最佳电视剧颁给了它? 靠八集篇幅创造了历史 评论 41最新闻 Hot
-
摩擦升级?洪森称柬武器可打击曼谷,泰方回怼
-
“CIA认定MI6内部有俄间谍,英国追查20年却一无所获”
-
加拿大命令海康威视停止在加运营,中方回应
-
与中国竞争,电先不够了?特朗普拟“开闸放地”
-
德国对DeepSeek下手
-
千余官兵驰援!超4万人紧急撤离榕江
-
巴基斯坦发生自杀式袭击,16名士兵死亡
-
又卖惨,“没中国,我们只能停工”
-
“美国目的昭然若揭:拿矿,跟中国对着干”
-
怕美国不来,又怕特朗普乱来,欧洲犯怵:“单挑”中国,我吗?
-
新军校,今天正式成立
-
“2022年,伊朗几乎成功刺杀蓬佩奥”
-
伊朗举行国葬
-
香港特首顾问团换届:李泽钜未续任,“杭州六小龙”两名创始人加入
-
担心经济被当“武器”?中小国家应当追溯问题源头
-
普京:在“北约不东扩”承诺上被骗
-