-
周波:中国在俄乌之间选择的到底是什么?
Why China is refusing to choose between Russia and Ukraine
Three weeks into the Ukrainian war, even if the dust – hopefully not radioactive dust – has not settled, it is already a cliché to say the world has been reshaped.
We are stepping into a world with two new cold wars to come. In Europe, where the war is raging on, panicking Europeans are already preparing for another cold war. The prospect of a “Russky Mir” (Russian world) has revived a “brain-dead” Nato.
Germany, a country most reluctant to embark on military build-up, has reversed decades of hesitancy and poured 100 billion euros into its defence budget. This makes “European strategic autonomy”, so far a slogan French President Emmanuel Macron has been championing, look more probable down the road. The only question is whether it will add strength to the transatlantic alliance or weaken it.
In Asia, the cold war that dawned with US president Donald Trump’s “great power competition” was intensified by Biden’s “extreme competition” with China. Biden had hoped to put Russia policy on a “stable and predictable” footing to focus on China, which is the US’ top priority. But the war in Europe further hollows out Biden’s Indo-Pacific strategy, which already has too many purposes without adequate tools.
If the key to small nations’ survival is making the right choice, then the art of living for a major power is to strike a balance. This is not “a moment of choice for China”, as Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison asserted.
Should China ditch Russia and walk into the Western camp, it won’t even reap the benefit of expediency. China will lose a strategic partner, and it is only a matter of how quickly the US will take on China again.
This explains why Beijing has expressed understanding of Russia’s “legitimate concerns” over Nato’s expansion while underlining that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries must be respected. It is also continuing to provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
In tough times, China doesn’t need to look elsewhere for inspiration. It only needs to stand firm on some of its time-tested principles, which could be also illuminating for others.
First, no-first-use of nuclear weapons. The Russian armed forces outgun and outnumber the Ukrainian forces, which have no nuclear weapons. Therefore, one wonders why Russian President Vladimir Putin needs to put his nuclear forces on high alert if this is not a strategy to“escalate to de-escalate”.
This strategy risks encouraging would-be nuclear weapon states and is definitely a heavy blow to non-proliferation. But it could become an opportune moment too, for China and the US to demonstrate their responsible attitude through discussions on no-first-use of nuclear weapons, a position China has held since it detonated a nuclear device in 1964.
Biden’s position that the “sole purpose” of the American arsenal “should be deterring – and if necessary, retaliating against – a nuclear attack” is not far from that of China. In mid-December 2021, nearly 700 scientists and engineers, including 21 Nobel laureates, asked Biden to cut the US nuclear arsenal by a third, and to declare that the United States would never be the first to use nuclear weapons in a conflict.
Second, non-alliance. The war in Ukraine again raises the West’s worst fears of the prospect of a China-Russia alliance. Such an alliance is impossible. Both China and Russia call for multipolarity, but for different reasons.
No country has benefited so much from globalization as China, which has a strong stake in safeguarding the international order. Despite differences and even tensions sometimes, China has deep ties with the West, including the US, that neither wish to sever.
In comparison, Russia resents the existing international order and sees itself as a victim. Putin called the break-up of the Soviet Union “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century”.
As long as China doesn’t harbour the desire for global military expansion which requires allies, it doesn’t need an alliance. All the military operations of the People’s Liberation Army overseas are humanitarian in nature. Its primary security concern lies in the Western Pacific, where the military balance between the PLA and the US military is closing.
One thing that was crystal clear before the Russian-Ukraine war, and which remains clear today, is that neither the US nor the 30-member-strong Nato, which includes three nuclear powers, dares to confront Russia head on.
China’s military strength is presumably no less formidable than Russia’s, apart from a nuclear arsenal that China chooses to keep small. The PLA is the largest armed force in the world in terms of active personnel. Its military budget, although less than 2 per cent of gross domestic product, is three times bigger than Russia’s. It has two aircraft carriers, with more in the pipeline, while Russia has just one.
Third, no pursuit of spheres of influence. The war in Ukraine is a clash between Russia and Nato over spheres of influence. Perhaps no region looks more like China’s sphere of influence than East Asia, but it isn’t. North Korea won’t give up its nuclear weapons as China and the whole world wishes, quite a few countries are American allies, and in the South China Sea, China has disputes with a few claimants.
The “Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States” released in February claims that “[China] is combining its economic, diplomatic, military, and technological might as it pursues a sphere of influence in the Indo-Pacific”.
This cannot be more wrong. “Influence” and “sphere of influence” are two different things. Today, China’s influence, especially in the economic field, is already felt worldwide. Therefore, it doesn’t need to establish spheres of influence anywhere that are costly and difficult to maintain.
The war in Ukraine, however disruptive, won’t stop the global political and economic shifts towards Asia with China at the centre. China is now the eye in the storm. Therefore, it should be the stabiliser. The benefit of making no choice is avoiding a bad choice.
【Senior Colonel Zhou Bo (ret) is a senior fellow of the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University and a China Forum expert】
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 小婷 
-
“哈萨克斯坦将成为有强大议会的总统制共和国”
2022-03-17 16:08 观察者头条 -
约翰逊“中东求油”遗憾收场:未获实质性增产承诺
2022-03-17 15:53 乌克兰之殇 -
韩防疫部门解释日增62万确诊:将抗原检测阳性纳入统计
2022-03-17 15:18 抗疫进行时 -
伊朗外长:美方满足最后两个要求,明天就去维也纳
2022-03-17 14:43 伊朗局势 -
不听美国劝,“印度或从俄进口约1500万桶原油”
2022-03-17 14:39 能源战略 -
英国答应偿还伊朗旧债后,美国也要让步?
2022-03-17 14:38 伊朗局势 -
男性乌克兰难民也难逃魔掌…
2022-03-17 14:20 -
宣布援乌136亿美元后,白宫:抗疫资金快要见底…
2022-03-17 14:00 美国一梦 -
爱尔兰总理在美检出新冠,曾与佩洛西近距离交谈
2022-03-17 13:46 美国一梦 -
“电话+信函联系俄罗斯,都没回”
2022-03-17 11:58 乌克兰之殇 -
泽连斯基提醒美国不要忘记珍珠港,日本网民不干了…
2022-03-17 11:31 乌克兰之殇 -
展示反华立场,澳总理竟要求中国澄清所谓“对俄支持”
2022-03-17 11:17 -
这次轮到俄罗斯艺术品拍卖会了
2022-03-17 11:13 俄罗斯之声 -
普京:有理由相信,乌克兰已在美国支持下制出生物武器部件
2022-03-17 11:08 乌克兰之殇 -
白宫再拒泽连斯基请求:对卷入三战不感兴趣
2022-03-17 10:54 乌克兰之殇 -
拜登加码8亿美元军援清单曝光:含最新攻击无人机
2022-03-17 10:45 乌克兰之殇 -
地震已致4死,东电:福岛第一核电站5号机无异常
2022-03-17 10:05 日本 -
日增62万例,韩国确诊数再创新高
2022-03-17 09:59 抗疫进行时 -
美国务院发言人:美伊或将达成协议,重启伊核协议
2022-03-17 09:51 伊朗局势 -
拜登又口误,称“第一夫人的丈夫”感染新冠
2022-03-17 09:45 美国一梦
相关推荐 -
国际刑事法院忍无可忍:再威胁试试 评论 170省级督察组现场核实情况,遭故意封路阻挠 评论 131嫦娥六号成功发射!开启人类首次月球背面取样之旅 评论 339“美军还没撤,俄军就把这里占了” 评论 224土耳其暂停与以色列所有贸易 评论 141最新闻 Hot
-
国际刑事法院忍无可忍:再威胁试试
-
澳大利亚“设卡”,中国在非洲淘到“白金”
-
“半数以上AI最热门领域,中国研究领先”
-
省级督察组现场核实情况,遭故意封路阻挠
-
美国又出新规:想要补贴,电动汽车上不能有“中国制造”
-
“中俄在台海附近军演,逼着美国改计划”
-
他催拜登采取行动:保住内塔尼亚胡,不然逮捕令会落到咱们身上
-
以代表称:没料到美国精英大学里也有哈马斯
-
“内塔尼亚胡决心竞选连任”
-
香港暴徒“屠龙小队”队长:计划使用炸弹杀害港警,至少30个
-
“美国各地逾2000名抗议者被捕”
-
“欧盟得把成年男性遣返乌克兰,上战场”
-
“这样拆掉中国设备,许多农村就没网了”
-
果然,印度和日本破防了
-
“美军还没撤,俄军就把这里占了”
-
“北约发这种提案,简直疯了”
-