-
周波:中国如何保护海外利益,又不卷入地区冲突?
最后更新: 2024-05-09 04:24:33以下为南华早报英文原文:
In response to the Houthis attacking ships in the Red Sea bound for Israel, the US recently announced Operation Prosperity Guardian, a security initiative that initially included more than 20 countries, such as Bahrain, Britain, Canada, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.
But France, Italy and Spain have reportedly dropped out of the US-led coalition and many others decline to acknowledge their involvement. That Bahrain is the only Arab state offering public support speaks volumes about the Arab world’s apathy towards the US – if not resentment of America’s strong support for Israel’s war on Hamas.
This does not look like the “broadest possible” coalition US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has called for. Unlike the counter-piracy initiative in the Gulf of Aden, none of America’s Asian allies and partners appear to have turned up this time.
It is strange to hear the US call on Beijing to play “a constructive role in trying to prevent those attacks from taking place”. China should have no such influence on the Houthis, a Yemeni militant group. Instead, should the Chinese naval flotilla operating in the Bab-el-Mandeb strait join the American-led operation, it would compromise China’s position on the Israel-Hamas war and endanger Chinese ships.
If there are still Chinese merchant ships sailing through the Red Sea, the Chinese flotilla should sail northwards to protect them, of course. Chinese warships have previously sailed from the Gulf of Aden to evacuate Chinese nationals from war-torn Libya, Yemen and Sudan.
But should Chinese warships strike back against a Houthi attack on a Chinese vessel, China could be drawn into a conflict in a most volatile region. The Houthis have vowed to continue their Red Sea attacks until Israel stops fighting in Gaza.
So how can the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) protect China’s overseas interests without becoming embroiled in regional conflicts?
China is the world’s top trader and most of the international trade goes by sea. About 12 per cent of global trade passes through the Red Sea with about 62 per cent of China’s oil and 17 per cent of its natural gas imports going through the Malacca Strait and South China Sea.
Reuters journalist Greg Torode recently argued that the Indian Ocean could be Beijing’s Achilles’ heel in a Taiwan war because, apart from its Djibouti military base, China has no air cover from land or sea for Indian Ocean naval deployments. This brings to mind two myths about China’s Indian Ocean strategy: the “ string of pearls” and so-called Malacca dilemma.
The first, a 2004 hypothesis, assumed that China aimed to build a string of military bases and monitoring stations to support its naval outreach up to the Horn of Africa. The Malacca dilemma points to China vulnerabilities should the US blockade the Malacca Strait in a war, cutting off China’s trade flows.
But two decades later, the string of pearls is nowhere to be found. Instead, a Maritime Silk Road is linking Chinese ports to a string of commercial ports: Piraeus in Greece, Kyaukpyu in Myanmar, Gwadar in Pakistan and Colombo and Hambantota in Sri Lanka.
We can’t know if the US would blockade the Malacca Strait but neither is there a guarantee of war in the Taiwan Strait. Beijing still talks about a peaceful reunification with Taiwan. A Malacca Strait blockade would cripple the economies of littoral states such as Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia. It would deal a heavy blow to Japan and South Korea, US allies that depend more heavily than China on the security of the strait.
Precisely because of the extreme importance of the Malacca Strait to China, a war triggered by an American blockade is unlikely to end there. If a war between China and the US involved the Indian Ocean, the conflict would have become uncontrollable – it would be a major war involving a lot of countries. The rest is up to everybody’s imagination.
On the face of it, the PLA Navy, albeit the largest in the world, does indeed look vulnerable in the Indian Ocean. Building a military base in a foreign land requires the permission of the country involved. Even if some countries are happy to accommodate, how would they resist pressure from, say, the US or India that sees itself as the “ net security provider” in the Indian Ocean?
But Beijing’s so-called vulnerability may not be a disadvantage. The PLA’s operations abroad are all humanitarian in nature, be it peacekeeping, vessel protection or disaster relief. So long as Beijing exclusively restricts its military operations to protecting its interests and providing humanitarian assistance when necessary, then China does not need a lot of military bases that are hugely costly and difficult to maintain.
Short of bases overseas, the Chinese navy has to maximise cooperation with other stakeholders. In countering piracy, although China’s flotillas work independently, they share information and coordinate with coalitions such as Nato, the Combined Maritime Forces, EU Atalanta and other independent deployers.
In recent years, the PLA’s naval vessels have conducted joint exercises with the Russian, Iranian and Pakistani navies in the Indian Ocean. Joint exercises have also been conducted with the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.
The best way to protect Chinese interests overseas is to blend them with the interests of others. Beijing does not need to look elsewhere for inspiration. Since 2008, Chinese flotillas have escorted some 7,200 ships transiting the Indian Ocean, including foreign ships. If the western Pacific Ocean is where China has to defend its sovereign rights, then the Indian Ocean looks more like a test ground for what a stronger China might mean for others.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 李泽西 
-
东部战区回应美舰过航台湾海峡
2024-05-08 23:04 台湾 -
福建舰顺利完成首次航行试验
2024-05-08 14:51 中国海军 -
德国派遣军舰来南海:考虑过台湾海峡
2024-05-08 14:47 -
美“艾森豪威尔”号航母再入红海:执勤超200天
2024-05-08 11:00 巴以恩仇录 -
“里根”号又出港,舰载机岸上忙训练
2024-05-07 21:40 -
“腿指定有病”美空军F-22再现起落架坍塌事故
2024-05-07 16:13 -
波音“星际客机”飞船首次载人试飞推迟
2024-05-07 12:25 航空航天 -
“黄蜂”号戒备群推迟部署期间,两艘LCAC又相撞
2024-05-06 18:35 -
俄罗斯举行“非战略核武器演习”:应对西方挑衅
2024-05-06 16:04 -
美军新任印太司令部司令就任 什么来头?
2024-05-06 15:55 凉战 -
一周军评:为什么我们还要更多的航母
2024-05-05 10:04 一周军事观察 -
俄技集团:2023年炮弹产量增加5倍、火箭弹增加7倍
2024-05-03 18:56 俄罗斯之声 -
韩国也想入伙“奥库斯”?
2024-05-01 17:18 三八线之南 -
相比前两艘航母,福建舰海试有何不同?
2024-05-01 12:00 航空航天 -
一年收到5架F-35 每架都有问题
2024-04-30 16:30 -
中越海警开展今年首次北部湾海域联合巡逻
2024-04-30 16:21 -
从豹2到布雷德利 莫斯科胜利公园新到什么西方装备?
2024-04-30 13:09 俄罗斯之声 -
外媒紧盯福建舰:或马上开始海试
2024-04-30 13:09 中国航母 -
乌军总司令:前线局势正在恶化,俄军取得局部胜利
2024-04-29 11:14 乌克兰之殇
相关推荐 -
来华试乘后,“凭啥中国人要永远买西方车?” 评论 95“照你说的,我们是输给中国了吧?”,她被问住了 评论 364联大通过涉巴勒斯坦“入联”决议 评论 415“对于联大第2758号决议,美国只有严格遵守的义务” 评论 221与匈牙利关系升级!中国的“朋友圈”还有哪些布局? 评论 131最新闻 Hot
-
她被问住:照你说的,我们是输给中国了吧
-
“西班牙、爱尔兰等国本月承认巴勒斯坦,后续还有更多”
-
联大通过涉巴勒斯坦“入联”决议
-
“电动汽车关税将升至100%,还要对医疗器械下手”
-
美国认了,又没认…
-
“美国想玩权游,中国会反击”
-
最后一天,印度从马尔代夫全部撤军
-
美欲对中国联网车下手,韩国又紧张了
-
为对付中国,他称美国得向印度取经
-
他向美媒“告洋状”,想蹭乌克兰却忘了……
-
乌克兰称俄军可能在北部开辟新战线
-
拜登都承认了,“布林肯报告仍将嘴硬”
-
“韩国得自卫,不然美军赢不了中国”
-
“对于联大第2758号决议,美国只有严格遵守的义务”
-
上万人抗议以色列,她也现身了
-
美议员举例广岛长崎支持向以供武,日外相:不可接受
-