-
周波:面对欧洲核威胁,中美应达成“不首先使用核武器”
英文原文:
No one knows how long the war in Ukraine will last. But everyone knows the worst nightmare is Russia decides to use a tactical nuclear bomb. Russian leaders have repeatedly hinted at this. Now some prominent Russian scholars such as Sergei Karaganov and Dmitri Trenin have joined the choir. They called for tactical nuclear weapons attacks on a NATO country, say, Poland, to “break the will” of the West and convince it that Russia’s nuclear threats are not a bluff.
If Russia’s warning on using nukes is a bluff, this tactic has already worked in that letting people mulling over if Moscow will use nuclear weapons or not is successful deterrence itself. But what if this is not a bluff? The west is nibbling away its own redlines, however gradually, by sending more and more sophisticated weapons to Kyiv that were considered taboos in the beginning, so why one can rest assured that Moscow won’t use nuclear weapons, eventually? The battlefield is in a stalemate.
Kyiv’s drone attacks were found in Moscow. Ukrainian President Zelensky warned that the war is “returning to Russia”.
Now that the threat of an unspeakable horror against humanity looms larger, perhaps a short-cut is China and the US reaching an agreement of no first use of nuclear weapons that will be joined by Britain and France and finally, Russia. Here is a lesson learnt. In the wake of the Indo-Pakistan nuclear tests in 1998, in a rare move to show solidarity, China and the US quickly came to a joint declaration of de-targeting their nuclear weapons against each other. This led to a joint statement among the five nuclear-weapon states in 2000 that their nuclear weapons are not targeted at each other or at any other states.
Similarly, in a joint statement issued by the five nuclear powers in January, 2022 -- a month before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, they agreed that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought”. If indeed a nuclear war cannot be won, then why can’t they pledge no first use of nukes in the first place? No first use doesn’t exclude nuclear retaliation; therefore, it won’t neutralize a nuclear power’s ability in deterrence.
For China, no first use of nuclear weapons is an iron-clad policy since its detonation of a nuclear device in 1964. Therefore, such a time-honored policy won’t change because of its rapprochement with Russia. The Biden administration declared that it would only “consider the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the United States or its allies and partners.” Such a policy is not so far away from that of Beijing.
The US can afford to make a no first use commitment more than any other countries. Today, the United States has overwhelming conventional military superiority. One can hardly cite a mission that the United States could not accomplish with conventional weapons.
The assertion that US needs nuclear weapons to defend its allies is questionable too. So far, DPRK- a de facto nuclear weapon state, is the only country that has repeatedly played with nuclear blackmails. It has even officially declared to use preemptive nuclear strikes in a new law, but this is a strategy of drawing attention. Unless the survival of Kim Jong-un ’s regime is in jeopardy, it is hard to understand why he would launch a suicidal nuclear attack on South Korea or Japan that will surely invite devastating retaliation. The whole Korean peninsula is only 1100 kilometers. The lingering radioactive dust will make any victory meaningless.
In 2001, Russia and China agreed not be the first to use nuclear weapons against each other. If Beijing and Washington agree on no first use, then it is entirely possible for Britain and France, two American allies, to reach the same deal with China.
The challenge is how to get Russia in, but it is not entirely impossible. President Putin should know nuclear weapons are not really game changers. No matter how formidable they seem, they didn’t help the US in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghan wars. They didn’t help the Soviet Union in Afghan war. They haven’t helped Russia in mitigating Ukraine’s strong resistance against Russia’s invasion, either.
This probably tells why in spite of his thinly-veiled hints, Putin has never overtly threatened to use nuclear weapons. Instead, he reiterated in a China-Russia joint declaration during President Xi Jinping’s visit to Moscow in March that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought”.
If the deepest concern of the US-led NATO is Putin might eventually resort to use of nuclear weapons, it needs to offer him an off-ramp, that is, NATO unilaterally promise no first use against Russia in any circumstances now. This is affordable for NATO. The largest military alliance in the world has 31- member states, three nuclear weapon states and its conventional forces far outnumber that of Russia. It is hard to imagine why it should launch a nuclear strike on Russia first.
Perhaps the final solution to defuse nuclear threats in European continent lies in NATO’s thinking of the unthinkable: a pledge of no further expansion after Sweden joins NATO. NATO membership is confined to European countries. After Sweden’s entry into NATO, there aren’t many countries queuing in line anyway. Only three countries, namely, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia and Ukraine are found on the waiting list.
Apparently, Bosnia and Herzegovina won’t add much weight to the military strength of NATO. Georgia already had a war with Russia, in part because of its wish to join NATO. At a time when no one can tell what is the endgame, NATO doesn’t need soul searching to know a “forever war” with a nuclear power is lethally dangerous.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 戴苏越 
-
“俄农行或可以间接方式重返环球银行间金融通信协会”
2023-09-10 08:57 -
李强会见意大利总理梅洛尼:双方应持续扩大双边贸易
2023-09-10 08:41 -
摩洛哥地震已致2012死、2059伤
2023-09-10 07:58 -
“当前两国关系面临复杂困难局面,但中日关系的重要性没有变”
2023-09-10 07:58 中日关系 -
李强在二十国集团领导人第十八次峰会第一阶段会议上的讲话(全文)
2023-09-10 07:57 -
李强会见冯德莱恩
2023-09-10 07:37 -
阿塞拜疆称亚美尼亚攻击其军队,亚方否认
2023-09-10 07:37 -
G20联合宣言通过,“部分段落呼吁和平与繁荣”
2023-09-09 23:14 G20 -
摩洛哥地震遇难人数升至1037人
2023-09-09 21:42 地震 -
美国在这国驻军规模要减半 ?
2023-09-09 19:54 非洲之窗 -
俄外交部:俄方正在为参加“一带一路”论坛做准备
2023-09-09 19:12 一带一路 -
摩洛哥地震已致820人死亡,暂无中国公民伤亡报告
2023-09-09 18:31 地震 -
李强出席二十国集团领导人第十八次峰会第一阶段会议并发表讲话
2023-09-09 18:30 G20 -
“中方已向美方严正交涉”
2023-09-09 15:51 中美关系 -
“支持印度入常,把印度打造成维修美海军资产中心”
2023-09-09 14:38 -
斥资近150亿元,“国轩高科将在美建电动车电池超级工厂”
2023-09-09 13:56 -
非盟成为G20正式成员
2023-09-09 13:52 G20 -
这样就能让运粮重启?联合国建议被俄乌一同批评
2023-09-09 11:59 乌克兰之殇
相关推荐 -
经济学家出身的他,为何被普京选为新防长? 评论 6欧盟高官:中国提供投资更灵活,我们很难比 评论 67“投票显示,美以遭前所未有孤立” 评论 18030万平民撤离,“美国为阻止进攻向以提供机密情报” 评论 109最新闻 Hot
-
“以军说那里是安全的,他们照做了,结果呢?”
-
“照你说的,我们是输给中国了吧?”,她被问住了
-
“西班牙、爱尔兰等国本月承认巴勒斯坦,后续还有更多”
-
联大通过涉巴勒斯坦“入联”决议
-
“电动汽车关税将升至100%,还要对医疗器械下手”
-
美国认了,又没认…
-
“美国想玩权游,中国会反击”
-
最后一天,印度从马尔代夫全部撤军
-
美欲对中国联网车下手,韩国又紧张了
-
为对付中国,他称美国得向印度取经
-
他向美媒“告洋状”,想蹭乌克兰却忘了……
-
乌克兰称俄军可能在北部开辟新战线
-
拜登都承认了,“布林肯报告仍将嘴硬”
-
“韩国得自卫,不然美军赢不了中国”
-
“对于联大第2758号决议,美国只有严格遵守的义务”
-
上万人抗议以色列,她也现身了
-