-
田士臣:扬言“出兵台海”,美国为什么从来不认为自己“违法”?
最后更新: 2023-02-24 08:58:22英文原文:
Long before former US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s high -profile visit to Taipei, the Taiwan issue had been deeply, frequently and regularly debated by US government ofcials, and those in Congress, academia and think tanks.
The latest discussion focuses on a possible visit by newly elected House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and the Defence Department’s military preparations for the consequences of such a visit.
But as they hotly debate the scenario of an inevitable US military intervention in a hypothetical cross -strait conflict, they forget to discuss – or they turn a blind eye to – the legality and justness of such an intervention. Yet they never seem to forget to criticise the Chinese government for its policy of peaceful reunification with Taiwan while not abandoning the right to use force.
What legal basis does the US have, under international law, to intervene militarily in a cross -strait conflict? To answer this, we need to examine the reasons for a possible US military intervention.
Think-tank dialogues with US experts show that about 80 per cent cite the protection of democracy. Another 15 per cent cite the Taiwan Relations Act, although this is merely US domestic law. The other 5 per cent frankly admit that, strategically, geopolitically and militarily, the US cannot aford to “lose” Taiwan.
The critical issue is whether these three categories of argument hold water under international law. This, as reflected in the UN Charter and international custom, only prescribes two scenarios for the legitimate use of force: UN Security Council authorisation or the right of self-defence. None of the three US categories of defence falls into either of the two scenarios for the legitimate right to use force.
Neither protecting democracy nor implementing domestic law is a lawful exception to the general prohibition against the use of force. If they were, any country could freely use force by claiming to be protecting democracy or through the enactment of a domestic law.
And while no one seems to question the legality of the use of force by the US in case of a cross -strait conflict, a motherland using force to take back its rebellious province – as would be the case for mainland China and Taiwan – is termed an act of “aggression” or an “invasion” .
Although those two words are diferent in English, there is only one word for both in Chinese – qin lue (侵略). This is a weighty word and people tend to equate it with aggression.
But the term “aggression” has a specific meaning in international law, whether in the resolution on the “definition of aggression” adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 14, 1974, or in the amendment to the Rome Statute on the crime of aggression, adopted by the member states of the International Criminal Court on June 12, 2010. The determination of an act of aggression and the crime of aggression are strictly regulated.
In accordance with the provisions of the two international instruments, an “act of aggression” refers to the use of force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another state or in any other manner contrary to the UN charter.
The one-China principle has been confirmed by the international community through UN resolutions. It has also been recognised at the bilateral level by most sovereign nations, including the United States, which conducts diplomatic relations with China. Since Taiwan is not a country but part of China, even if the Chinese government uses force to restore its sovereignty over Taiwan, it would be a sovereign act rather than one between states.
How could that be taken as an act of aggression under international law? If the US were to intervene militarily, it would be the aggressor, violating the UN’s fundamental principle against the use of force in international relations, in invading Chinese territory.
Acquiescence to a potentially unlawful US military intervention while questioning the Chinese government’s legitimate right to use force only adds to the already rampant tolerance of American exceptionalism in international law.
This has not only led to questions about the moral integrity of the West, but has also destroyed the collective security system enshrined in the UN Charter, which was designed “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind” .
The US military, in shooting down an unmanned Chinese civilian airship that had ended up in US airspace due to force majeure, has set another dangerous precedent, violating the fundamental principle of the UN Charter on the prohibition of the use of force.
Even if the US wanted to neutralise the balloon, it should have employed its law enforcement agencies to carry out the mission. Given that China’s foreign ministry has repeatedly said the balloon was an unmanned Chinese civilian airship, America’s use of its military instead of civilian law enforcement agencies is a clear violation of Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter.
This states, and we hope the US takes note, that: “All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. ”
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 戴苏越 
-
官方披露全国已有6亿栋房屋,是否过剩?
2023-02-24 07:36 观网财经-房产 -
阿里季度营收2478亿,同比增长2%
2023-02-23 21:19 观网财经-互联网 -
美国一核武器铀工厂火灾导致数百人疏散,官方称无放射性泄露
2023-02-23 17:32 -
汪文斌:美国的霸权政策和好战倾向延续一天,世界就将一天不得安宁
2023-02-23 16:27 中国外交 -
十年来央企整合减少18家:仅中国铁塔共享基站就省下1760亿
2023-02-23 15:59 国企备忘录 -
曾被限制投屏的会员们,“撑”起了爱奇艺的财报
2023-02-23 15:51 观网财经-互联网 -
商丘公交:确保不停运
2023-02-23 13:44 基层治理 -
商丘公交:亏损严重,市区公交线路停运
2023-02-23 09:56 基层治理 -
“如果特别军事行动不以胜利结束,俄罗斯将会被撕得粉碎”
2023-02-22 22:54 -
中国最大顺风车平台三闯港交所:营收净利双降、市场份额暴跌
2023-02-22 20:16 观网财经-金融 -
中方回应布林肯涉华言论:口出狂言、颠倒黑白
2023-02-22 16:39 观察者头条 -
雄安情侣买房有“连心贷”?农行回应
2023-02-22 15:43 观网财经-房产 -
国台办:支持符合条件的台企在A股上市
2023-02-22 11:35 观网财经-金融 -
全面注册制首批企业柏诚股份:曾因代持发生股权纠纷
2023-02-22 10:43 观网财经-金融 -
民警异地办案猥亵嫌疑人之妻被拘,领导致歉
2023-02-22 10:05 -
媒体:“试管婴儿被放错胚胎”事件初步和解
2023-02-22 07:22 -
SHEIN“狂飙”上市,如何回报中国产业工人?
2023-02-21 17:58 观网财经-互联网 -
去年广东高职毕业生月均收入比农民工低
2023-02-21 09:12 最难就业季 -
俄亥俄泄露本该处理得更好,当地却采用了直接点燃
2023-02-21 08:59 美国一梦 -
复旦团队发布国内首个类ChatGPT模型MOSS
2023-02-20 22:23 观网财经-互联网
相关推荐 -
内塔尼亚胡遭以战时内阁成员下“最后通牒” 评论 67“至少一代人不会把西欧视为合作伙伴” 评论 128“美国居然在锯自己骑着的那根树枝,蠢得可怕” 评论 212换一种方式,让国宝“回家” 评论 129矛头直指哈尔科夫,普京首次公开俄军意图 评论 212最新闻 Hot
-
美国享受中国廉价商品的时代要终结了?
-
美方坐不住:中方维护硅谷巨头的海底电缆,不放心啊
-
内塔尼亚胡遭以战时内阁成员下“最后通牒”
-
“至少一代人不会把西欧视为合作伙伴”
-
换一种方式,让国宝“回家”
-
对抗中国?菲律宾加购5艘日本大型巡逻船
-
“我讨厌‘一带一路’,因为这绝妙的构想不是我们提出的”
-
斯洛伐克总理菲佐遭枪击后,他收到死亡威胁
-
12月6日前裁决,TikTok和美司法部要求法院启动快速通道
-
矛头直指哈尔科夫,普京首次公开俄军意图
-
“我们不承认台湾,今后也不会”
-
加拿大果然想跟,声称“不能给中国留后门…”
-
“美国居然在锯自己骑着的那根树枝,蠢得可怕”
-
法国邀请俄罗斯,英美不满
-
又在搞事,马科斯称菲律宾将“强力捍卫领土”
-
泽连斯基承认:我们很多旅都打光了...
-