-
程静、许竞之:美副国务卿访华需拿出诚意,如果想来上课中国不吃这一套
最后更新: 2021-07-23 09:40:10(英文版原文发表于《南华早报》)
As the No 2 US diplomat Wendy Sherman kicks off her Asian trip this week, no one has completely ruled out the possibility that she will visit China.
Even before her trip, signals were sent out on several occasions hinting at a high-level engagement between the United States and China. However, whether it is White House Indo-Pacific coordinator Kurt Campbell’s expectations of a meeting between Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping, or US national security adviser Jake Sullivan’s suggestion of a Biden-Xi meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit, China has yet to say yes.
“Of course we hope to resume dialogue, but it depends on whether the US is sincere,” Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said at the World Peace Forum in Beijing, when asked whether there would be a high-level meeting between China and the US this year.
Wang stressed that the most important thing for China now is to continue to handle its own affairs well. Wang’s attitude was also echoed by officials for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Many have cited cultural and psychological reasons as explanations for China’s reservations. As oriental culture is more sensitive about maintaining reputations and saving face, high-level engagements should be conducted in a friendly environment that may have been specifically created.
So, in the eyes of many Chinese people, when the US announced sanctions on Chinese and Hong Kong officials just before the Alaska talks in March, it was a humiliation and far from a friendly curtain-raiser.
This time, ahead of Sherman’s possible visit to China, the US issued a “business advisory” about the risks of operating in Hong Kong and sanctioned seven officials from the central government’s liaison office in Hong Kong – once again sounding an ominous note.
Having said that, behind such cultural and psychological factors are complicated strategic and geopolitical reasons that should be explored.
Why does China remain doubtful about American sincerity? And, what lies behind the US’ expressions of interest in meeting Chinese leaders? To answer these questions, some lessons could be drawn from the meeting in Anchorage, Alaska.
As clearly manifested in the Anchorage talks, the US does not engage with China with the sincere intention to deal with bilateral issues, such as enhancing cooperation or tackling global challenges together in the time of Covid-19. Rather, the US seeks first to appease its domestic audience.
A diplomatic meeting was turned into a showcase for the Biden administration’s tough policy towards China before the American public, including the Republicans. This is a clear signal that the US-China engagement in Anchorage was about teaching the Chinese a lesson on human rights issues, rather than improving bilateral relations.
As the No 2 US diplomat Wendy Sherman kicks off her Asian trip this week, no one has completely ruled out the possibility that she will visit China.
Even before her trip, signals were sent out on several occasions hinting at a high-level engagement between the United States and China. However, whether it is White House Indo-Pacific coordinator Kurt Campbell’s expectations of a meeting between Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping, or US national security adviser Jake Sullivan’s suggestion of a Biden-Xi meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit, China has yet to say yes.
“Of course we hope to resume dialogue, but it depends on whether the US is sincere,” Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said at the World Peace Forum in Beijing, when asked whether there would be a high-level meeting between China and the US this year.
Wang stressed that the most important thing for China now is to continue to handle its own affairs well. Wang’s attitude was also echoed by officials for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Many have cited cultural and psychological reasons as explanations for China’s reservations. As oriental culture is more sensitive about maintaining reputations and saving face, high-level engagements should be conducted in a friendly environment that may have been specifically created.
So, in the eyes of many Chinese people, when the US announced sanctions on Chinese and Hong Kong officials just before the Alaska talks in March, it was a humiliation and far from a friendly curtain-raiser.
This time, ahead of Sherman’s possible visit to China, the US issued a “business advisory” about the risks of operating in Hong Kong and sanctioned seven officials from the central government’s liaison office in Hong Kong – once again sounding an ominous note.
Having said that, behind such cultural and psychological factors are complicated strategic and geopolitical reasons that should be explored.
Why does China remain doubtful about American sincerity? And, what lies behind the US’ expressions of interest in meeting Chinese leaders? To answer these questions, some lessons could be drawn from the meeting in Anchorage, Alaska.
As clearly manifested in the Anchorage talks, the US does not engage with China with the sincere intention to deal with bilateral issues, such as enhancing cooperation or tackling global challenges together in the time of Covid-19. Rather, the US seeks first to appease its domestic audience.
A diplomatic meeting was turned into a showcase for the Biden administration’s tough policy towards China before the American public, including the Republicans. This is a clear signal that the US-China engagement in Anchorage was about teaching the Chinese a lesson on human rights issues, rather than improving bilateral relations.
Notably, the timing of Sherman’s possible visit and its strategic intentions give the lie to the seriousness of the Biden administration’s intentions to engage China.
It is customary for a new US administration’s first state visits to be to allied countries. Biden has just finished his alliance campaign in Europe, where he attended the G7 summit last month.
He has held face-to-face meetings with leaders of allied countries including Britain, Japan and South Korea. Since the US views China as a rival, it’s natural that it is not on that list.
However, the strained relationship between the US and Russia has not prevented Biden from meeting President Vladimir Putin in a third country.
Even at the height of the Cold War, the US and Soviet Union remained engaged with each other to at least manage the crisis. Thus, Sherman’s by-the-way visit to China speaks for itself. This is an itinerary detail that’s more optional than essential.
Finally, it is the strategic intention behind the US engagement with China that plays the most important role in defining the relationship between the two. Domestically, the Biden administration has seldom delivered policy positions without the containment of China serving as a backdrop.
Internationally, the China issue has been put forward by the US as a central topic to be discussed with all its allies and partners on either bilateral or multilateral occasions.
The US has urged these nations to take a harder line on Beijing’s human rights problem, economic practices, hi-tech development and military issues. A new global infrastructure programme, “Build Back Better World”, has been purposely adopted to rival China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
All these efforts are aimed at better positioning the US in its competition with China. US practices give the distinct impression that the nation is not developing itself to deliver peace and prosperity to its people and the international community. Instead, it is mobilising its domestic and international resources to contain another state. Its strategic goal is not to develop itself but to compete with another nation.
Worse, at a time when fighting the Covid-19 pandemic and restoring the economy are top human rights priorities for the world, and international cooperation is more necessary than ever, the US has used every lever it has to push big-power competition.
The dilemma of having to choose a side has been thrust upon nearly every state, like it or not. Disinformation, sanctions and coercion with regard to China have become the “new normal” as the US pushes others to take sides.
When diplomatic engagement is applied in a strategic confrontation, it is no wonder that China is being cautious. Chinese wariness should also serve as a warning to other countries in this region.
When the Biden administration loudly declares that the US is back, it also means that America is back in the Asia-Pacific. However, given the devastation of the Korean, Afghanistan and Vietnam wars, the real question is how much the US can be trusted to deliver on its boast that it plays a stabilising role in the region.
Dr Cheng Jing is an associate fellow at the Global Governance Institution and lecturer at the School of Foreign Studies, Xidian University
Xu Jingzhi is an intern at the Global Governance Institution. She studies at New York University Shanghai, majoring in political science and economics
(https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3141792/will-xi-meet-biden-why-china-wary-us-diplomatic-intentions)
- 原标题:程静、许竞之:舍曼访华美国需拿出外交诚意,再来上课中国不吃这一套 本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 赵珺婕 
-
“拒不道歉”的澳总理,还是道歉了
2021-07-23 09:36 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
联合国秘书长呼吁各国遵守奥林匹克休战传统
2021-07-23 08:16 -
日本大使美化军国主义罪行,中方当场痛斥
2021-07-23 08:08 -
尼日利亚暴发霍乱,首都死亡人数达60人
2021-07-23 07:42 -
美国新增确诊52677例、死亡291例
2021-07-23 07:27 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
南非:骚乱已致337人死亡
2021-07-23 07:01 -
美国前驻俄大使:试图离间中俄是白费功夫
2021-07-22 22:48 中俄关系 -
罕见!土耳其遭到五常一致谴责
2021-07-22 21:33 -
菲媒咬定中国在南海“非法采油”,遭菲总统府打脸
2021-07-22 18:51 -
外国网友:中国偷窃美国技术!哦等等,美国没有
2021-07-22 18:30 科技前沿 -
普京就河南严重内涝致慰问电,中方:衷心感谢
2021-07-22 18:12 河南暴雨 -
东京都今日疫情:新增1979例,连续两天破纪录
2021-07-22 17:20 东京奥运会 -
东奥开幕前一天,没导演了…
2021-07-22 17:08 东京奥运会 -
外交部:30国领导人已公开接种中国疫苗
2021-07-22 16:37 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
菅义伟:日本举办奥运是安全的,你看英国不也…
2021-07-22 16:23 东京奥运会 -
日本公布5个疫苗护照适用国,没有中美
2021-07-22 16:21 日本 -
王毅:叙利亚老百姓因制裁为大饼发愁时,有些国家却大谈人权
2021-07-22 16:13 叙利亚内战 -
小萨马兰奇期待北京冬奥,日网民酸了
2021-07-22 15:54 东京奥运会 -
商务部:下半年外贸增速将有所回落
2021-07-22 15:26 中国经济 -
英国央行不还黄金,委内瑞拉:准备战斗
2021-07-22 15:15 不列颠
相关推荐 -
习近平同法国总统马克龙举行小范围会谈 评论 0中法欧领导人三方会晤结束 评论 36习近平将同马克龙和冯德莱恩举行三方会晤 评论 8“五一”近3亿人次出游,较2019年同期增长28.2% 评论 202最新闻 Hot
-
3个月后米莱终于回应:岛在他们手上,不把这当挑衅
-
“欧盟工具箱里没有美国式禁令”
-
地面进攻在即?以军疏散拉法平民,哈马斯警告“后果”
-
中法欧领导人三方会晤结束
-
“我明确一点,不建议对华保持距离,我们需要中国人”
-
“五一”近3亿人次出游,较2019年同期增长28.2%
-
欧盟又挑争端?点名上汽、比亚迪、吉利,或抬高关税
-
问界回应山西M7车祸四大疑问:事发车速超过AEB工作范围
-
德国外长炒作:对待中国,不能再犯这个错
-
“美国这么做捞不到好处,还会便宜日韩”
-
自作自受?对俄制裁回旋镖射中一瘸一拐的波音
-
马科斯声称:菲律宾不希望加剧南海紧张局势
-
“我想让各位知道,我们不会退缩”
-
他也要对TikTok“真香”了?
-
内塔尼亚胡:任何国际机构都无法阻止以色列“自卫”
-
“美国首次暂停,以色列深感担忧”
-