-
周波:太空不应成为中美竞争的新疆场
最后更新: 2021-03-12 13:58:28To avoid the folly of a US-China space race, the two competitors should learn some Soviet-era cooperation
It is interesting to see how, in one month, Mars suddenly had three visitors from Earth. First, the United Arab Emirates’ probe named Amal, or Hope, arrived on February 9; a day later, China’s Tianwen-I entered Mars’ orbit. Perseverance, Nasa’s newest rover, landed on the red planet’s surface on February 18. Why can’t nations pool their resources and knowledge on such gargantuan tasks that are extremely difficult and expensive?
In outer space, all issues basically boil down to two categories: peaceful use and demilitarisation of space. No matter how desirable the former sounds, the latter is the real challenge. US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin described space as “an arena of great power competition”.
But, during the Cold War, the United States and Soviet Union managed to cooperate on the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, the first international partnership in space. On July 17, 1975, an American Apollo spacecraft, launched two days earlier, docked with a Soviet Soyuz spacecraft.
Sadly, this won’t happen between China and the US, the two largest economies today. The Wolf Amendment limits US government agencies such as Nasa from working with Chinese commercial or governmental agencies. However, a prosperous China can afford to invest lavishly in a domestic space industry that is self-propelled and sustainable.
In some areas, China has already overtaken the United States. China’s 500-metre Aperture Spherical Telescope, larger than the US-run Arecibo spherical reflector dish in Puerto Rico, is the biggest in the world. On December 1, 2020, the same day a Chinese lunar probe landed on the moon, the Arecibo dish collapsed.
Unlike Washington, which does not allow Chinese astronauts into the US-built International Space Station, Beijing appears more open-minded about space cooperation with other nations.
Beijing has said it is ready to share its moon samples with international institutions and scientists as space belongs to everyone. It has also declared in a UN memorandum that China’s space station, set to be completed in 2022, will be used for international scientific experiments and flights for international astronauts.
The International Space Station is scheduled to expire in 2024. But even after a life extension to 2030, which passed in the US Senate but has stalled in the House of Representatives, China’s space station might be the only one in orbit. Will the Americans ask Beijing for a ride then?
Avoiding militarisation of outer space, however lofty the aim, is easier said than done. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits placing any weapons of mass destruction in orbit, establishing military bases or installations, testing any type of weapons or conducting military exercises on the moon and other celestial bodies.
Since the 1980s, the UN has had several debates on avoiding a space arms race. So far, though, countries have failed to negotiate another treaty for the purpose. In 2018, the US voted “no” on four UN resolutions which included prevention of an arms race in outer space and no first placement of weapons in outer space.
One outstanding problem is how to define what constitutes a space weapon or the weaponisation of space. Most space technologies are dual-use in nature – the same technology can be used for military or civilian purposes. Even a satellite that can move close enough to another satellite can pose a threat. Lasers, electronic jamming, directed energy weapons and offensive cyber tools can all become weapons that threaten satellites.
A difference in interpretations should not be an insurmountable barrier if all countries agree there will be no winners in a space arms race. The US, China, Russia and India have successfully conducted anti-satellite tests. The US is more vulnerable than any other countries because it has more civilian and military assets in space that are subject to potential attacks from adversaries.
Beijing is vulnerable, too. In the past three years, China had more rocket launches than any other country. Space is becoming increasingly crowded. In a single launch in January, a SpaceX Falcon 9 sent 143 small satellites into orbit, and thousands of new satellites will be sent to orbit in the coming decade. Every nation has a stake in space security.
The lessons of the Cold War might prove useful. During that time, mutually assured destruction helped prevent an all-out nuclear war. This concept only came into being when Washington and Moscow decided they could not have an edge over the other in the arms race and a strategic equilibrium, even balanced by terror, was more desirable than war.
Similarly, in avoiding militarisation or weaponisation in space, perhaps the way out is recognition of mutually assured vulnerability by major spacefaring nations that eventually leads to a treaty agreeing not to deploy any weapons in outer space.
If enemies could cooperate during the Cold War, why not competitors today? It is a relief that the Biden administration has renewed the New Start nuclear arms control agreement. The agreement prohibited, among other things, either country from interfering with the other side’s “national technical means” for monitoring compliance. This is understood to include satellite reconnaissance systems.
China-US cooperation in selected civil space projects will steer more countries to join the effort to develop space. It is possible, too. During China’s 2019 moon exploration mission, Nasa got Congressional approval for a specific interaction with China’s National Space Administration to monitor China’s landing of a lunar probe on the dark side of the moon using Nasa’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Competition is part of human nature, but no human folly is more monumental than attempting to place weapons in orbit to strike Earth to eliminate adversaries. Astronaut Michael Collins once suggested that the political leaders of the world should see their planet from 160,000 km away to change their outlook. What could they see? “The all-important border would be invisible, that noisy argument suddenly silenced.”
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 小婷 
-
长七A火箭成功发射!
2021-03-12 06:47 航空航天 -
李克强:不能让科研人员把精力花在填表、评比等事务上
2021-03-11 18:00 科技前沿 -
20.5亿美元!Roivant相中Silicon,成为资本孵化出计算机制药巨头?
2021-03-11 16:00 投资 -
中俄签署合作建设国际月球科研站谅解备忘录
2021-03-09 20:49 航空航天 -
F5G:国家产业安全与发展的重要新契机
2021-03-08 17:30 F5G进行时 -
试车成功!我国500吨级重型火箭发动机研制取得重要突破
2021-03-05 16:47 航空航天 -
为建空间站,长征火箭将首次进行组合式发射
2021-03-03 19:27 航空航天 -
“中国飞艇”AS700将于年内首飞
2021-03-03 18:54 中国精造 -
数学家周毓麟院士逝世,曾为我国核武器事业发展作出重大贡献
2021-03-03 15:54 -
中日合作团队观测到超100万亿电子伏特的伽马射线
2021-03-02 08:11 天文 -
2020年度中国科学十大进展发布
2021-02-27 08:44 观察者头条 -
我国制定的航天国际标准正式发布
2021-02-25 21:09 航空航天 -
解决以太网丢包世界难题:华为方案落地
2021-02-25 17:32 华为 -
“解剖”百年历史建筑:上海城市智能体迈出关键一步
2021-02-25 15:23 -
清华团队新成果在《自然》发表:有望解决光刻机自主研发难题
2021-02-25 14:17 科技前沿 -
今年,我国航天发射次数有望首次突破40次
2021-02-25 07:28 航空航天 -
我国成功发射遥感三十一号03组卫星
2021-02-24 11:30 航空航天 -
天问一号进入火星停泊轨道
2021-02-24 09:07 航空航天 -
美德研究:地球上某些微生物可在火星暂时存活
2021-02-24 08:18 航空航天 -
NASA公布首批登陆火星图像和音频
2021-02-23 09:00 航空航天
相关推荐 -
美国胁迫下,阿斯麦CEO最新涉华表态 评论 145他张嘴就来:不寻求与中国贸易战,但中企作弊… 评论 236乌克兰暗示西方“双标”,美欧:你们和以色列不一样 评论 380美国对中国造船业等发起301调查,商务部:一错再错 评论 449“令人鼓舞!无法想象没有中国的全球供应链” 评论 48最新闻 Hot
-
美国胁迫下,阿斯麦CEO最新涉华表态
-
与中国建交后首次!美澳紧盯这国选举
-
G7财长:将协调对伊、对俄制裁
-
他张嘴就来:不寻求与中国贸易战,但中企作弊…
-
美菲军演将击沉“中国造”军舰,菲军方声称“不是故意为之”
-
声称选举不自由,美国将恢复对委内瑞拉制裁
-
“以色列曾考虑周一反击伊朗,但最终决定推迟”
-
威胁上了?法财长:欧洲要对中国“露出獠牙”
-
事关TikTok,他竟想借着援乌援以法案“夹带私货”
-
乌克兰暗示西方“双标”,美欧:你们和以色列不一样
-
他离任前“反华之心不死”,扬言全面封锁制裁“援俄中企”
-
美国对中国造船业等发起301调查,商务部:一错再错
-
德英当面劝说克制,内塔尼亚胡:我们将自己决定
-
“令人鼓舞!无法想象没有中国的全球供应链”
-
这是迪拜…
-
“最后一刻,乌克兰突然退出”
-